Re: [REPOST PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: Add the concept of an "init" state

[kbuild test robot]

Hi Doug,

[auto build test ERROR on pinctrl/for-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Douglas-Anderson/drivers-pinctrl-Add-the-concept-of-an-init-state/20151021-101131
config: i386-randconfig-x004-10191220 (attached as .config)
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=i386 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/base/dd.c: In function 'really_probe':
>> drivers/base/dd.c:325:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'pinctrl_init_done' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     pinctrl_init_done(dev);
     ^
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +/pinctrl_init_done +325 drivers/base/dd.c

   319		} else if (drv->probe) {
   320			ret = drv->probe(dev);
   321			if (ret)
   322				goto probe_failed;
   323		}
   324	
 > 325		pinctrl_init_done(dev);
   326	
   327		if (dev->pm_domain && dev->pm_domain->sync)
   328			dev->pm_domain->sync(dev);

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

Attachment: .config.gz
Description: Binary data