[PATCH 4.1 086/202] netfilter: nfnetlink: work around wrong endianess in res_id field

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit a9de9777d613500b089a7416f936bf3ae5f070d2 upstream.

The convention in nfnetlink is to use network byte order in every header field
as well as in the attribute payload. The initial version of the batching
infrastructure assumes that res_id comes in host byte order though.

The only client of the batching infrastructure is nf_tables, so let's add a
workaround to address this inconsistency. We currently have 11 nfnetlink
subsystems according to NFNL_SUBSYS_COUNT, so we can assume that the subsystem
2560, ie. htons(10), will not be allocated anytime soon, so it can be an alias
of nf_tables from the nfnetlink batching path when interpreting the res_id
field.

Based on original patch from Florian Westphal.

Reported-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c
@@ -432,6 +432,7 @@ done:
 static void nfnetlink_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct nlmsghdr *nlh = nlmsg_hdr(skb);
+	u_int16_t res_id;
 	int msglen;
 
 	if (nlh->nlmsg_len < NLMSG_HDRLEN ||
@@ -456,7 +457,12 @@ static void nfnetlink_rcv(struct sk_buff
 
 		nfgenmsg = nlmsg_data(nlh);
 		skb_pull(skb, msglen);
-		nfnetlink_rcv_batch(skb, nlh, nfgenmsg->res_id);
+		/* Work around old nft using host byte order */
+		if (nfgenmsg->res_id == NFNL_SUBSYS_NFTABLES)
+			res_id = NFNL_SUBSYS_NFTABLES;
+		else
+			res_id = ntohs(nfgenmsg->res_id);
+		nfnetlink_rcv_batch(skb, nlh, res_id);
 	} else {
 		netlink_rcv_skb(skb, &nfnetlink_rcv_msg);
 	}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/