Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] perf tools: Config BPF maps through perf cmdline

[Wangnan (F)]

On 2015/10/18 4:35, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 10/17/15 3:48 AM, Wang Nan wrote:
> > In these 7 patches:
> >
> >   1. perf is able to put values into map:
> >    # perf record -e mybpf.c/maps.values.value=1234/ ...
> >
> >   2. perf is able to control different slots in a map separately:
> >    # perf record -e 
> > mybpf.c/maps.values.value[1,4-6]=1234,maps.values.value[0,2-3]=5678/ ...
> >
> >   3. The second syntax can be applied to perf event also:
> >    # perf record -v -a -e evt=cycles -e 
> > mybpf.c/maps.pmu_map.event[0]=evt/ ...
> >
> >   4. Compatible with the old syntax:
> >    # perf record -v -a -e evt=cycles -e 
> > mybpf.c/maps.pmu_map.event=evt/ ...
>
> The concept looks good and solves real need.
> No opinion on implementation.
Can I translate these words into an acked-by?

And what's your PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT going on? I think based on this
patchset you can test it with perf now.

Thank you.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/