Re: [PATCH v3 for-4.4] block: flush queued bios when process blocks to avoid deadlock

From: Ming Lei
Date: Sat Oct 17 2015 - 12:04:36 EST


On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:47 AM, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The block layer uses per-process bio list to avoid recursion in
> generic_make_request. When generic_make_request is called recursively,
> the bio is added to current->bio_list and generic_make_request returns
> immediately. The top-level instance of generic_make_request takes bios
> from current->bio_list and processes them.
>
> Commit df2cb6daa4 ("block: Avoid deadlocks with bio allocation by
> stacking drivers") created a workqueue for every bio set and code
> in bio_alloc_bioset() that tries to resolve some low-memory deadlocks by
> redirecting bios queued on current->bio_list to the workqueue if the
> system is low on memory. However another deadlock (see below **) may
> happen, without any low memory condition, because generic_make_request
> is queuing bios to current->bio_list (rather than submitting them).
>
> Fix this deadlock by redirecting any bios on current->bio_list to the
> bio_set's rescue workqueue on every schedule call. Consequently, when
> the process blocks on a mutex, the bios queued on current->bio_list are
> dispatched to independent workqueus and they can complete without
> waiting for the mutex to be available.

It isn't common to acquire mutex/semaphone inside .make_request()
or .request_fn(), so I am wondering it is good to reuse the rescuing
workqueue for this unusual case.

Also sometimes it can hurt performance by converting I/O submission
from one context into concurrent contexts of workqueue, especially
in case of sequential I/O, since plug & plug merge can't be used any
more.

>
> Also, now we can remove punt_bios_to_rescuer() and bio_alloc_bioset()'s
> calls to it because bio_alloc_bioset() will implicitly punt all bios on
> current->bio_list if it performs a blocking allocation.
>
> ** Here is the dm-snapshot deadlock that was observed:
>
> 1) Process A sends one-page read bio to the dm-snapshot target. The bio
> spans snapshot chunk boundary and so it is split to two bios by device
> mapper.
>
> 2) Device mapper creates the first sub-bio and sends it to the snapshot
> driver.
>
> 3) The function snapshot_map calls track_chunk (that allocates a structure
> dm_snap_tracked_chunk and adds it to tracked_chunk_hash) and then remaps
> the bio to the underlying device and exits with DM_MAPIO_REMAPPED.
>
> 4) The remapped bio is submitted with generic_make_request, but it isn't
> issued - it is added to current->bio_list instead.
>
> 5) Meanwhile, process B (dm's kcopyd) executes pending_complete for the
> chunk affected be the first remapped bio, it takes down_write(&s->lock)
> and then loops in __check_for_conflicting_io, waiting for
> dm_snap_tracked_chunk created in step 3) to be released.
>
> 6) Process A continues, it creates a second sub-bio for the rest of the
> original bio.
>
> 7) snapshot_map is called for this new bio, it waits on
> down_write(&s->lock) that is held by Process B (in step 5).
>
> Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267650
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Depends-on: df2cb6daa4 ("block: Avoid deadlocks with bio allocation by stacking drivers")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> block/bio.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 19 +++++++++++--
> kernel/sched/core.c | 7 ++---
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> v3: improved patch header, changed sched/core.c block callout to blk_flush_queued_io(),
> io_schedule_timeout() also updated to use blk_flush_queued_io(), blk_flush_bio_list()
> now takes a @tsk argument rather than assuming current. v3 is now being submitted with
> more feeling now that (ab)using the onstack plugging proved problematic, please see:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2015-October/msg00087.html
>
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index ad3f276..99f5a2ad 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -354,35 +354,35 @@ static void bio_alloc_rescue(struct work_struct *work)
> }
> }
>
> -static void punt_bios_to_rescuer(struct bio_set *bs)
> +/**
> + * blk_flush_bio_list
> + * @tsk: task_struct whose bio_list must be flushed
> + *
> + * Pop bios queued on @tsk->bio_list and submit each of them to
> + * their rescue workqueue.
> + *
> + * If the bio doesn't have a bio_set, we leave it on @tsk->bio_list.
> + * However, stacking drivers should use bio_set, so this shouldn't be
> + * an issue.
> + */
> +void blk_flush_bio_list(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> - struct bio_list punt, nopunt;
> struct bio *bio;
> + struct bio_list list = *tsk->bio_list;
> + bio_list_init(tsk->bio_list);
>
> - /*
> - * In order to guarantee forward progress we must punt only bios that
> - * were allocated from this bio_set; otherwise, if there was a bio on
> - * there for a stacking driver higher up in the stack, processing it
> - * could require allocating bios from this bio_set, and doing that from
> - * our own rescuer would be bad.
> - *
> - * Since bio lists are singly linked, pop them all instead of trying to
> - * remove from the middle of the list:
> - */
> -
> - bio_list_init(&punt);
> - bio_list_init(&nopunt);
> -
> - while ((bio = bio_list_pop(current->bio_list)))
> - bio_list_add(bio->bi_pool == bs ? &punt : &nopunt, bio);
> -
> - *current->bio_list = nopunt;
> -
> - spin_lock(&bs->rescue_lock);
> - bio_list_merge(&bs->rescue_list, &punt);
> - spin_unlock(&bs->rescue_lock);
> + while ((bio = bio_list_pop(&list))) {
> + struct bio_set *bs = bio->bi_pool;
> + if (unlikely(!bs)) {
> + bio_list_add(tsk->bio_list, bio);
> + continue;
> + }
>
> - queue_work(bs->rescue_workqueue, &bs->rescue_work);
> + spin_lock(&bs->rescue_lock);
> + bio_list_add(&bs->rescue_list, bio);
> + queue_work(bs->rescue_workqueue, &bs->rescue_work);
> + spin_unlock(&bs->rescue_lock);
> + }

Not like rescuring path, schedule out can be quite frequent, and the
above change will switch to submit these I/Os from wq concurrently,
which might hurt performance for sequential I/O.

Also I am wondering why not submit these I/Os in 'current' context
just like what flush plug does?

> }
>
> /**
> @@ -422,7 +422,6 @@ static void punt_bios_to_rescuer(struct bio_set *bs)
> */
> struct bio *bio_alloc_bioset(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nr_iovecs, struct bio_set *bs)
> {
> - gfp_t saved_gfp = gfp_mask;
> unsigned front_pad;
> unsigned inline_vecs;
> unsigned long idx = BIO_POOL_NONE;
> @@ -457,23 +456,11 @@ struct bio *bio_alloc_bioset(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nr_iovecs, struct bio_set *bs)
> * reserve.
> *
> * We solve this, and guarantee forward progress, with a rescuer
> - * workqueue per bio_set. If we go to allocate and there are
> - * bios on current->bio_list, we first try the allocation
> - * without __GFP_WAIT; if that fails, we punt those bios we
> - * would be blocking to the rescuer workqueue before we retry
> - * with the original gfp_flags.
> + * workqueue per bio_set. If an allocation would block (due to
> + * __GFP_WAIT) the scheduler will first punt all bios on
> + * current->bio_list to the rescuer workqueue.
> */
> -
> - if (current->bio_list && !bio_list_empty(current->bio_list))
> - gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_WAIT;
> -
> p = mempool_alloc(bs->bio_pool, gfp_mask);
> - if (!p && gfp_mask != saved_gfp) {
> - punt_bios_to_rescuer(bs);
> - gfp_mask = saved_gfp;
> - p = mempool_alloc(bs->bio_pool, gfp_mask);
> - }
> -
> front_pad = bs->front_pad;
> inline_vecs = BIO_INLINE_VECS;
> }
> @@ -486,12 +473,6 @@ struct bio *bio_alloc_bioset(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nr_iovecs, struct bio_set *bs)
>
> if (nr_iovecs > inline_vecs) {
> bvl = bvec_alloc(gfp_mask, nr_iovecs, &idx, bs->bvec_pool);
> - if (!bvl && gfp_mask != saved_gfp) {
> - punt_bios_to_rescuer(bs);
> - gfp_mask = saved_gfp;
> - bvl = bvec_alloc(gfp_mask, nr_iovecs, &idx, bs->bvec_pool);
> - }
> -

Looks you touched rescuing path for bio allocation, and better to just
do one thing in one patch.

> if (unlikely(!bvl))
> goto err_free;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index 19c2e94..5dc7415 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -1084,6 +1084,22 @@ static inline bool blk_needs_flush_plug(struct task_struct *tsk)
> !list_empty(&plug->cb_list));
> }
>
> +extern void blk_flush_bio_list(struct task_struct *tsk);
> +
> +static inline void blk_flush_queued_io(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Flush any queued bios to corresponding rescue threads.
> + */
> + if (tsk->bio_list && !bio_list_empty(tsk->bio_list))
> + blk_flush_bio_list(tsk);
> + /*
> + * Flush any plugged IO that is queued.
> + */
> + if (blk_needs_flush_plug(tsk))
> + blk_schedule_flush_plug(tsk);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * tag stuff
> */
> @@ -1671,11 +1687,10 @@ static inline void blk_flush_plug(struct task_struct *task)
> {
> }
>
> -static inline void blk_schedule_flush_plug(struct task_struct *task)
> +static inline void blk_flush_queued_io(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> }
>
> -
> static inline bool blk_needs_flush_plug(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> return false;
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 10a8faa..eaf9eb3 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3127,11 +3127,10 @@ static inline void sched_submit_work(struct task_struct *tsk)
> if (!tsk->state || tsk_is_pi_blocked(tsk))
> return;
> /*
> - * If we are going to sleep and we have plugged IO queued,
> + * If we are going to sleep and we have queued IO,
> * make sure to submit it to avoid deadlocks.
> */
> - if (blk_needs_flush_plug(tsk))
> - blk_schedule_flush_plug(tsk);
> + blk_flush_queued_io(tsk);
> }
>
> asmlinkage __visible void __sched schedule(void)
> @@ -4718,7 +4717,7 @@ long __sched io_schedule_timeout(long timeout)
> long ret;
>
> current->in_iowait = 1;
> - blk_schedule_flush_plug(current);
> + blk_flush_queued_io(current);
>
> delayacct_blkio_start();
> rq = raw_rq();
> --
> 2.3.8 (Apple Git-58)
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/