Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] bpf: add support for persistent maps/progs

From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Fri Oct 16 2015 - 19:54:16 EST


Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> We can argue about api for 2nd, whether it's mount with fd=1234 string
> or else, but for the first mount style doesn't make sense.

Why does mount not make sense? It is exactly what you are looking for
so why does it not make sense?

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/