Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: samsung: exynos5250: Add DISP1 clocks

[Kukjin Kim]

On 10/17/15 03:56, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On 16 October 2015 at 19:26, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 10/16, Michael Turquette wrote:
>>> Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2015-10-15 16:46:27)
>>>> On 15.10.2015 19:31, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>>>> When the DISP1 power domain is powered off, there's two clocks that need
>>>>> to be temporarily reparented to OSC, and back to their original parents
>>>>> when the domain is powered on again.
>>>>>
>>>>> We expose these two clocks in the DT bindings so that the DT node of the
>>>>> power domain can reference them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>> - Reuse mout_aclk200_p
>>>>> - Rename div_aclk300 as div_aclk300_disp
>>>>>
>>>>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c   | 14 +++++++++++++-
>>>>>  include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h |  4 +++-
>>>>>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Applied to clk-next.
>>>
>>
>> I think Tomeu wanted to take this through arm-soc? Otherwise
>> we'll need to provide a stable branch for the dt header.
> 
> Hi, Stephen is right, the second patch depends on this one.
> 
So...how can I take 2nd patch of this series in samsung(arm-soc) tree?
And this series shouldn't be for fixes for 4.3?...Mike how do you think?

Thanks,
Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/