Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix alignement of __bug_table section entries

From: Robert Jarzmik
Date: Thu Sep 10 2015 - 16:58:43 EST


Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I've been wondering whether we can teach GCC that set_domain modifies
> the value that get_domain returns, rather than throwing a volatile
> onto the asm in get_domain. The issue with a volatile there is that
> even if the result is unused, but the code is reachable, gcc still has
> to output the code to read the register.
>
> We might be able to get away with a memory clobber on the set_domain,
> and fake a memory read in get_domain, eg, by passing
> "m" (current_thread_info()->cpu_domain))
> to the get_domain asm.
Ok, let's say we do it that way.

I have some concerns about it:
(a) I see an inbalance, as set_domain() doesn't actually modify
current_thread_info()->cpu_domain. I don't see how it will protect use
from this scenario :
- get_domain()
- set_domain()
- set_domain()

(b) domain.h is included from thread_info.h, not the other way around
=> current_thread_info() is not accessible from domain.h
=> that would require a bit of moving things around, as thread_info
structure description should be available for example.
This is currently my biggest problem with this approach.

(c) I was also wondering if a case like this could happen :
- a function foo() does a get_domain()
=> an exception/irq whatever happens and modifies the DACR
- foo() continues a makes a modify_domain()
=> and here the modify_domain() uses the old DACR value
Or said differently, I wonder if there is a case of 2 get_domain() calls
in a row with a DACR modification in between. I

What about something such as [1], without a memory clobber, but a "fake" memory
variable link ?

Cheers.

--
Robert

[1] get_domain() / set_domain() link
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
index e878129f2fee..fc1d9c43aa08 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h
@@ -83,13 +83,17 @@

#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__

+static int domain_barrier;
+/*
+ * how to get the current stack pointer in C
+ */
static inline unsigned int get_domain(void)
{
unsigned int domain;

asm(
"mrc p15, 0, %0, c3, c0 @ get domain"
- : "=r" (domain));
+ : "=r" (domain), "=m" (domain_barrier));

return domain;
}
@@ -97,8 +101,8 @@ static inline unsigned int get_domain(void)
static inline void set_domain(unsigned val)
{
asm volatile(
- "mcr p15, 0, %0, c3, c0 @ set domain"
- : : "r" (val));
+ "mcr p15, 0, %1, c3, c0 @ set domain"
+ : "=m" (domain_barrier) : "r" (val));
isb();
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/