Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] of: to support binding numa node to specified device in devicetree

From: Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Date: Thu Sep 10 2015 - 07:28:53 EST


Hi all,

Can somebody take a few moments to review it? This patch is
too small, only changed two lines.

Thanks,
Thunder.

On 2015/8/25 12:08, Zhen Lei wrote:
> For now, in function device_add, the new device will be forced to
> inherit the numa node of its parent. But this will override the device's
> numa node which configured in devicetree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/base/core.c | 2 +-
> drivers/of/device.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index dafae6d..e06de82 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ int device_add(struct device *dev)
> dev->kobj.parent = kobj;
>
> /* use parent numa_node */
> - if (parent)
> + if (parent && (dev_to_node(dev) == NUMA_NO_NODE))
> set_dev_node(dev, dev_to_node(parent));
>
> /* first, register with generic layer. */
> diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c
> index 8b91ea2..e5f47ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/device.c
> @@ -60,11 +60,12 @@ int of_device_add(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> ofdev->name = dev_name(&ofdev->dev);
> ofdev->id = -1;
>
> - /* device_add will assume that this device is on the same node as
> - * the parent. If there is no parent defined, set the node
> - * explicitly */
> - if (!ofdev->dev.parent)
> - set_dev_node(&ofdev->dev, of_node_to_nid(ofdev->dev.of_node));
> + /*
> + * If this device has not binding numa node in devicetree, that is
> + * of_node_to_nid returns NUMA_NO_NODE. device_add will assume that this
> + * device is on the same node as the parent.
> + */
> + set_dev_node(&ofdev->dev, of_node_to_nid(ofdev->dev.of_node));
>
> return device_add(&ofdev->dev);
> }
> --
> 2.5.0
>
>
>
> .
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/