Re: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: add support for s390

[Kees Cook]

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 10:45 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 09/09/2015 10:40 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> Re-ping. Can someone pull this into their tree?
>>>
>>> -Kees
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> This adds support for s390 to the seccomp selftests. Some improvements
>>>> were made to enhance the accuracy of failure reporting, and additional
>>>> tests were added to validate assumptions about the currently traced
>>>> syscall. Also adds early asserts for running on older kernels to avoid
>>>> noise when the seccomp syscall is not implemented.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>
>>
>> Sorry looks like it got lost in my LinuxCon backlog. I will queue it
>> up for 4.3-rc1.
>>
>
> Hmm. It doesn't apply to linux-kselftest next. Based on your comment
>
> "This applies on top of -next, following the addition of the powerpc
> tests."

Well, it was -next when I sent it. :) The powerpc changes are now in
Linus's tree, so there should be no problem. Is your linux-kselftest
merged with 4.3-rc yet?

-Kees

>
> This one probably should go through PowerPc tree.
>
> Adding Michael Ellerman to the thread,. Michael! Something
> you can take in for 4.3-rc1??
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
>
>
>
> --
> Shuah Khan
> Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
> Open Source Innovation Group
> Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
> shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 217-8978



-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/