Re: [PATCH 1/5] tools: Add err.h with ERR_PTR PTR_ERR interface

[RaphaÃl Beamonte]

2015-09-08 17:06 GMT-04:00 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Em Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 04:22:39PM -0400, RaphaÃl Beamonte escreveu:
>> 2015-09-07 4:38 GMT-04:00 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> > Adding part of the kernel's <linux/err.h> interface:
>> >   inline void * __must_check ERR_PTR(long error);
>> >   inline long   __must_check PTR_ERR(__force const void *ptr);
>> >   inline bool   __must_check IS_ERR(__force const void *ptr);
>> >
>> > it will be used to propagate error through pointers
>> > in following patches.
>> >
>> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-ufgnyf683uab69anmmrabgdf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> >  tools/include/linux/err.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>> >  create mode 100644 tools/include/linux/err.h
>> >
>> > diff --git a/tools/include/linux/err.h b/tools/include/linux/err.h
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index 000000000000..c9ada48f5156
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/tools/include/linux/err.h
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
>> > +#ifndef __TOOLS_LINUX_ERR_H
>> > +#define __TOOLS_LINUX_ERR_H
>> > +
>> > +#include <linux/compiler.h>
>> > +#include <linux/types.h>
>> > +
>> > +#include <asm/errno.h>
>> > +
>> > +/*
>> > + * Original kernel header comment:
>> > + *
>> > + * Kernel pointers have redundant information, so we can use a
>> > + * scheme where we can return either an error code or a normal
>> > + * pointer with the same return value.
>> > + *
>> > + * This should be a per-architecture thing, to allow different
>> > + * error and pointer decisions.
>> > + *
>> > + * Userspace note:
>> > + * The same principle works for userspace, because 'error' pointers
>> > + * fall down to the unused hole far from user space, as described
>> > + * in Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt for x86_64 arch:
>> > + *
>> > + * 0000000000000000 - 00007fffffffffff (=47 bits) user space, different per mm hole caused by [48:63] sign extension
>> > + * ffffffffffe00000 - ffffffffffffffff (=2 MB) unused hole
>> > + *
>> > + * It should be the same case for other architectures, because
>> > + * this code is used in generic kernel code.
>> > + */
>> > +#define MAX_ERRNO      4095
>> > +
>> > +#define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) unlikely((x) >= (unsigned long)-MAX_ERRNO)
>> > +
>> > +static inline void * __must_check ERR_PTR(long error)
>> > +{
>> > +       return (void *) error;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static inline long __must_check PTR_ERR(__force const void *ptr)
>> > +{
>> > +       return (long) ptr;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR(__force const void *ptr)
>> > +{
>> > +       return IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)ptr);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +#endif /* _LINUX_ERR_H */
>> > --
>> > 2.4.3
>>
>> Perhaps a dumb question, but it seems the code is exactly the same as
>> in linux/err.h besides the part of the comment you added. Why not
>> using that file directly in the other patches then?
>
> We can't do that.
>
> Read:
>
> commit 3f735377bfd6567d80815a6242c147211963680a
> Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Sun Jul 5 22:48:21 2015 -0300
>
>     tools: Copy lib/rbtree.c to tools/lib/
>
>     So that we can remove kernel specific stuff we've been stubbing out via
>     a tools/include/linux/export.h that gets removed in this patch and to
>     avoid breakages in the future like the one fixed recently where
>     rcupdate.h started being used in rbtree.h.
>
>
> --------------------------
>
> There are more copies like that, but the explanation above should be
> enough, no?

Yes, I understand now! Thanks!

>
>
> - Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/