[PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 092/130] target: REPORT LUNS should return LUN 0 even for dynamic ACLs

From: Luis Henriques
Date: Fri Sep 04 2015 - 09:23:30 EST


3.16.7-ckt17 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 9c395170a559d3b23dad100b01fc4a89d661c698 upstream.

If an initiator doesn't have any real LUNs assigned, we should report
LUN 0 and a LUN list length of 1. Some versions of Solaris at least
go beserk if we report a LUN list length of 0.

Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ luis: backported to 3.16: adjusted context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/target/target_core_spc.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c b/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
index 2f1c928210b3..a897f4a51a51 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
@@ -1238,11 +1238,8 @@ sense_reason_t spc_emulate_report_luns(struct se_cmd *cmd)
* coming via a target_core_mod PASSTHROUGH op, and not through
* a $FABRIC_MOD. In that case, report LUN=0 only.
*/
- if (!sess) {
- int_to_scsilun(0, (struct scsi_lun *)&buf[offset]);
- lun_count = 1;
+ if (!sess)
goto done;
- }

spin_lock_irq(&sess->se_node_acl->device_list_lock);
for (i = 0; i < TRANSPORT_MAX_LUNS_PER_TPG; i++) {
@@ -1267,6 +1264,14 @@ sense_reason_t spc_emulate_report_luns(struct se_cmd *cmd)
* See SPC3 r07, page 159.
*/
done:
+ /*
+ * If no LUNs are accessible, report virtual LUN 0.
+ */
+ if (lun_count == 0) {
+ int_to_scsilun(0, (struct scsi_lun *)&buf[offset]);
+ lun_count = 1;
+ }
+
lun_count *= 8;
buf[0] = ((lun_count >> 24) & 0xff);
buf[1] = ((lun_count >> 16) & 0xff);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/