Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: don't load 32-bit binaries if platform has no aarch32_el0

From: Suzuki K. Poulose
Date: Tue Sep 01 2015 - 13:41:47 EST


On 01/09/15 17:04, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:41:12PM +0100, Yury Norov wrote:
Kernel option COMPAT defines the ability of executing aarch32 binaries.
Some platforms does not support aarch32 mode, and so cannot execute that
binaries. But we cannot just disable COMPAT for them because the same
kernel binary may be used by multiple platforms.

In this patch, system_supports_aarch32_el0() is introduced to detect
aarch32 support at run-time.

Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h | 6 ++++--
arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 9 +++++++++
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 20cdc26..d24ea15 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ void check_local_cpu_errata(void);
void check_local_cpu_features(void);
bool cpu_supports_mixed_endian_el0(void);
bool system_supports_mixed_endian_el0(void);
+bool system_supports_aarch32_el0(void);

#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
index faad6df..461897b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
/*
* ELF register definitions..
*/
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <asm/user.h>

@@ -173,8 +174,9 @@ typedef compat_elf_greg_t compat_elf_gregset_t[COMPAT_ELF_NGREG];

/* AArch32 EABI. */
#define EF_ARM_EABI_MASK 0xff000000
-#define compat_elf_check_arch(x) (((x)->e_machine == EM_ARM) && \
- ((x)->e_flags & EF_ARM_EABI_MASK))
+#define compat_elf_check_arch(x) (system_supports_aarch32_el0() \
+ && ((x)->e_machine == EM_ARM) \
+ && ((x)->e_flags & EF_ARM_EABI_MASK))

#define compat_start_thread compat_start_thread
#define COMPAT_SET_PERSONALITY(ex) set_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
index 75d5a86..95d953f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
@@ -79,6 +79,15 @@ bool system_supports_mixed_endian_el0(void)
return mixed_endian_el0;
}

+#define AARCH64 1
+#define AARCH32_64 2

These should be better namespaced. Perhaps ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_EL0_64 and
ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_EL0_6432 ?

+bool system_supports_aarch32_el0(void)
+{
+ struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_data);
+ u64 arm64_el0 = info->reg_id_aa64pfr0 & 0xf;
+ return arm64_el0 == AARCH32_64;
+}

We should handle this the same way as we do for endianness support and
check that all CPUs support AArch32, and set a global flag, rather than
assuming that all CPUs are symmetric. Likewise for any other feature we
have to dynamically detect.

Correct. With my series, which I will post after the merge window, we should be able to
define this as a CPU capability and check that bit instead, which would give us a system
wide value.

Suzuki



Thanks,
Mark.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/