RE: [PATCH 3/3] PM / hibernate: Remove the restriction when checking memory size before/after hibernation

From: Chen, Yu C
Date: Tue Sep 01 2015 - 05:55:09 EST


Hi Ingo, thanks for your review/suggestion,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ingo Molnar [mailto:mingo.kernel.org@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ingo
> Molnar
> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 1:38 PM
> To: Chen, Yu C
> Cc: tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; mingo@xxxxxxxxxx; rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> pavel@xxxxxx; hpa@xxxxxxxxx; Brown, Len; yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx;
> joeyli.kernel@xxxxxxxxx; Zhang, Rui; linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM / hibernate: Remove the restriction when
> checking memory size before/after hibernation
>
>
> * Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * No need to check num_physpages with get_num_physpages
> > + * as we did before(please refer to git log), because
> > + * is_nosave_page will ensure that each page is safe
> > + * to be restored.
> > + */
> > if (reason) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR "PM: Image mismatch: %s\n", reason);
> > return -EPERM;
>
> No, this removes a useful sanity check that protects against data corruption.
>
> If you want to relax it then you should add code that checks whether the
> before/after memory image is truly a superset of each other, and warn and
> deny the hibernation in any other case. (For example when RAM got
> removed or moved.)
>
OK, I've sent out another patch based on pfn_mapped checking.thanks

Best Regards,
Yu
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/