Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] KVM: Dynamic Halt-Polling

[Wanpeng Li]

On 8/30/15 8:13 AM, Peter Kieser wrote:
> On 2015-08-29 4:55 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > On 8/30/15 6:26 AM, Peter Kieser wrote:
> > > Thanks, Wanpeng. Applied this to Linux 3.18 and seeing much higher 
> > > CPU usage (200%) for qemu 2.4.0 process on a Windows 10 x64 guest. 
> > > qemu parameters:
> >
> > Thanks for the report. If Paolo's patch "kvm: add halt_poll_ns module 
> > parameter" is applied on your 3.18? Btw, do you test the linux guest? 
>
> No high CPU usage on Linux guests. 

What's the difference w/ and w/o the patchset?

> Following patch series are applied (in order):
>
> * kvm: add halt_poll_ns module parameter
> * KVM: make halt_poll_ns static
> * KVM: Dynamic Halt-Polling v4

I will find a windows 10 x64 guest to figure out what happens tomorrow. 
Do you test other windows guest(like win7)? Btw, could you test v3 
dynamic halt-polling(against windows 10 guest) which David gives the 
shrink/grow logic different with v4. Many thanks for your time, Peter! ;-)

Regards,
Wanepng Li

> -Peter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/