Re: [PATCH 4/4] remoteproc: debugfs: Add ability to boot remote processor using debugfs

From: Lee Jones
Date: Thu Aug 27 2015 - 02:46:30 EST


On Wed, 26 Aug 2015, Nathan Lynch wrote:

> On 08/26/2015 08:08 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> The commit message should describe why this is needed...
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> > index 9d30809..9620962 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
> > @@ -88,8 +88,33 @@ static ssize_t rproc_state_read(struct file *filp, char __user *userbuf,
> > return simple_read_from_buffer(userbuf, count, ppos, buf, i);
> > }
> >
> > +static ssize_t rproc_state_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *userbuf,
> > + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> > +{
> > + struct rproc *rproc = filp->private_data;
> > + char buf[2];
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = copy_from_user(buf, userbuf, 1);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + switch (buf[0]) {
> > + case '1':
> > + ret = rproc_boot(rproc);
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "Boot failed: %d\n", ret);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + rproc_shutdown(rproc);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return count;
> > +}
>
> ... and I suggest that the user interface be reconsidered. If '1' means
> "boot" and literally anything else means "shut down" then you can't add
> operations in the future without potentially breaking things.

Good points, will fix.

--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/