Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] arm64: Add basic support for Marvell Berlin4CT SoC

[Sebastian Hesselbarth]

On 07/30/2015 01:13 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:57:27 +0200
> Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On 07/30/2015 11:35 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > Marvell Berlin4CT is a SoC based on 64bit ARMv8 architecture. It contains
> > > quad CA53 cores.
> > >
> > > This SoC shares many HW IP with BG2Q and other berlin series. This patchset
> > > was tested on Berlin4CT DMP board, and boot to shell ok.
> > >
> > > Since v4:
> > >    - rebased on the latest next tree
> >
> > Jisheng,
> >
> > some git basics, so you get a better idea of the merge process:
> >
> > Please do not base your patches on linux-next. It is not a stable branch
> > I can refer to. Also, if there was any dependency with another feature
> > that your patches require, you should mention that dependency by
> > pointing out either a floating patch set or even better a _stable_
> > topic branch of the feature that will be added in the same cycle you
> > expect your patches to be merged.
>
> Got it. Thanks for the kindly remind. There's only one dependency:
> "arm64: Split out platform options to separate Kconfig" from Olof.

AFAIKS, the patch in question has been applied by Olof for the next
cycle and after 4.2-rc2. You just name the patch, while Olof and I
will have to work it out:

@Olof: Any specific branch you want me to base a potential PR for
the initial Berlin4CT patches on? If you prefer to pick up the
two patches directly, feel free to add my

Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx>

> > AFAIKS, there is no dependency at all so please just base them on -rc1
>
> I'd like to learn more to avoid future inconvenience. This means it's better
> to rebase on 4.2-rc, right?

You can rebase on anything that is considered stable, i.e. my
berlin/foo-for-4.x-n branches become stable as soon as I send out a PR
to arm-soc. Before stable I can reorder/squash/fixup any patches
in there (or anything that will change the commit hash). Once I
declare it stable and anything needs to be changed, I'll have to
apply proper patches or even apply revert patches.

> Another question is: could patches be based on arm-soc tree if necessary?
> for example: if I need the "arm64: Split out platform options to separate
> Kconfig" commit.

Not directly, arm-soc by itself has no stable branches I know of. But
there may be stable topic branches that can be referred to but that
will be worked out on single topics by arm-soc/subsystem maintainers
and patch authors. Likely cross-subsystem patch sets or large patch
sets will end up in topic branches.

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/