Re: cgroup/loop Bad page state oops in Linux v4.2-rc3-136-g45b4b782e848

[Josh Boyer]

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:27:16AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> We've gotten a report[1] that any of the upcoming Fedora 23 install
>>> images are all failing on 32-bit VMs/machines.  Looking at the first
>>> instance of the oops, it seems to be a bad page state where a page is
>>> still charged to a group and it is trying to be freed.  The oops
>>> output is below.
>>>
>>> Has anyone seen this in their 32-bit testing at all?  Thus far nobody
>>> can recreate this on a 64-bit machine/VM.
>>>
>>> josh
>>>
>>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247382
>>>
>>> [    9.026738] systemd[1]: Switching root.
>>> [    9.036467] systemd-journald[149]: Received SIGTERM from PID 1 (systemd).
>>> [    9.082262] BUG: Bad page state in process kworker/u5:1  pfn:372ac
>>> [    9.083989] page:f3d32ae0 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:f2252178 index:0x16a
>>> [    9.085755] flags: 0x40020021(locked|lru|mappedtodisk)
>>> [    9.087284] page dumped because: page still charged to cgroup
>>> [    9.088772] bad because of flags:
>>> [    9.089731] flags: 0x21(locked|lru)
>>> [    9.090818] page->mem_cgroup:f2c3e400
>>
>> It's also still locked and on the LRU. This page shouldn't have been
>> freed.
>>
>>> [    9.117848] Call Trace:
>>> [    9.118738]  [<c0aa22c9>] dump_stack+0x41/0x52
>>> [    9.120034]  [<c054e30a>] bad_page.part.80+0xaa/0x100
>>> [    9.121461]  [<c054eea9>] free_pages_prepare+0x3b9/0x3f0
>>> [    9.122934]  [<c054fae2>] free_hot_cold_page+0x22/0x160
>>> [    9.124400]  [<c071a22f>] ? copy_to_iter+0x1af/0x2a0
>>> [    9.125750]  [<c054c4a3>] ? mempool_free_slab+0x13/0x20
>>> [    9.126840]  [<c054fc57>] __free_pages+0x37/0x50
>>> [    9.127849]  [<c054c4fd>] mempool_free_pages+0xd/0x10
>>> [    9.128908]  [<c054c8b6>] mempool_free+0x26/0x80
>>> [    9.129895]  [<c06f77e6>] bounce_end_io+0x56/0x80
>>
>> The page state looks completely off for a bounce buffer page. Did
>> somebody mess with a bounce bio's bv_page?
>
> Looks the page isn't touched in both lo_read_transfer() and
> lo_read_simple().
>
> Maybe it is related with aa4d86163e4e(block: loop: switch to VFS ITER_BVEC),
> or it  might be helpful to run 'git bisect' if reverting aa4d86163e4e can't
> fix the issue, suppose the issue can be reproduced easily.

I can try reverting that and getting someone to test it.  It is
somewhat complicated by having to spin a new install ISO, so a report
back will be somewhat delayed.  In the meantime, I'm also asking
people to track down the first kernel build that hits this, so
hopefully that gives us more of a clue as well.

It is odd that only 32-bit hits this issue though.  At least from what
we've seen thus far.

josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/