Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Replace recover_policy with new_policy in cpufreq_online()

[Viresh Kumar]

On 29-07-15, 03:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The recover_policy is unsed in cpufreq_online() to indicate whether
> a new policy object is created or an existing one is reinitialized.
> 
> The "recover" part of the name is slightly confusing (it should be
> "reinitialization" rather than "recovery") and the logical not (!)
> operator is applied to it in almost all of the checks it is used in,
> so replace that variable with a new one called "new_policy" that
> will be true in the case of a new policy creation.
> 
> While at it, drop one of the labels that is jumped to from only
> one spot.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> One extra cleanup on top of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6888751/
> 
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |   23 +++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/