Re: [lkp] [sched/preempt] 103637a5b94: 12.4% fsmark.app_overhead, -1.4% fsmark.files_per_sec

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 07:32:03PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> I guess that's because of cond_resched_lock() usage in nfs_scan_commit_list().
> My patch fixes cond_resched_lock() which never worked since v3.13.

Yeah, I wasn't surprised to see preemptions go up with this patch, not
total throughput suffer a bit due to that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/