Re: [PATCH] virt: IRQ bypass manager

From: Alex Williamson
Date: Mon Jul 13 2015 - 14:37:31 EST


On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 23:09 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 10/07/2015 19:52, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > Perhaps if a second consumer comes along that would be justification for
> > tying it elsewhere in the build system. ARM will obviously need to do
> > similar. Are there better options?
> >
> > Also, there's no maintainer for the top level virt/ directory. Paolo,
> > would you feel comfortable taking this, maybe with some additional acks?
>
> That's okay; alternatively, we can share it since after all you wrote
> most of it.

Sure. Actually my wording was confusing, I was actually just suggesting
the patch be merged through the KVM tree since I think the consumer code
is going to be significantly bulkier than the producer code. I can
certainly add a MAINTAINERS entry for virt/lib/ that we can share if you
like. Thanks,

Alex


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/