Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Initialize the governor again while restoring policy

From: Pi-Cheng Chen
Date: Wed Jul 08 2015 - 02:02:33 EST


On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> When all CPUs of a policy are hot-unplugged, we EXIT the governor but
> don't mark policy->governor as NULL. This was done in order to keep last
> used governor's information intact in sysfs, while the CPUs are offline.
>
> We also missed marking policy->governor as NULL while restoring the
> policy. Because of that, we call __cpufreq_governor(CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS)
> for an uninitialized policy. Which eventually returns -EBUSY.
>
> Fix this by setting policy->governor to NULL while restoring the policy.

Tested-by: "Pi-Cheng Chen <pi-cheng.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>"

Thanks for your fix.

>
> Reported-by: Pi-Cheng Chen <pi-cheng.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 18bf3a124ef8 ("cpufreq: Mark policy->governor = NULL for inactive policies")
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> For 4.2-rc
>
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index b612411655f9..2c22e3902e72 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1132,6 +1132,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_restore(unsigned int cpu)
>
> down_write(&policy->rwsem);
> policy->cpu = cpu;
> + policy->governor = NULL;
> up_write(&policy->rwsem);
> }
>
> --
> 2.4.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/