Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: storage : Remove c99 style commenting

From: Sunny Kumar
Date: Fri Jun 26 2015 - 14:12:34 EST


On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:08:42AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Sunny Kumar wrote:
>
> > This patch fixes checkpatch.pl warning c99 style commenting.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sunny Kumar <sunny.kumar.roy@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/storage/sddr55.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/sddr55.c b/drivers/usb/storage/sddr55.c
> > index aacedef..54d0a59 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/storage/sddr55.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/sddr55.c
> > @@ -209,10 +209,10 @@ static int sddr55_read_data(struct us_data *us,
> > unsigned int len, offset;
> > struct scatterlist *sg;
> >
> > - // Since we only read in one block at a time, we have to create
> > - // a bounce buffer and move the data a piece at a time between the
> > - // bounce buffer and the actual transfer buffer.
> > -
> > + /* Since we only read in one block at a time, we have to create
> > + * a bounce buffer and move the data a piece at a time between the
> > + * bounce buffer and the actual transfer buffer.
> > + */
> > len = min((unsigned int) sectors, (unsigned int) info->blocksize >>
> > info->smallpageshift) * PAGESIZE;
> > buffer = kmalloc(len, GFP_NOIO);
> > @@ -336,10 +336,10 @@ static int sddr55_write_data(struct us_data *us,
> > return USB_STOR_TRANSPORT_FAILED;
> > }
> >
> > - // Since we only write one block at a time, we have to create
> > - // a bounce buffer and move the data a piece at a time between the
> > - // bounce buffer and the actual transfer buffer.
> > -
> > + /* Since we only write one block at a time, we have to create
> > + * a bounce buffer and move the data a piece at a time between the
> > + * bounce buffer and the actual transfer buffer.
> > + */
> > len = min((unsigned int) sectors, (unsigned int) info->blocksize >>
> > info->smallpageshift) * PAGESIZE;
> > buffer = kmalloc(len, GFP_NOIO);
>
> Why did you fix just these two sites? There are lots of other places
> in usb-storage that use C99-style comments:
>
> $ cd drivers/usb/storage
> $ egrep '[^:]//' *.[ch] | wc
> 177 1635 9562
>
> (The [^:] is to avoid matching things like "http://";, and as a result
> this misses the four places where a // comment starts at the beginning
> of a line.)
>
> Why not fix all of them?
These were C99 muliline comments so thought of fixing ..
>
> Alan Stern
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/