Re: [PATCH 8/8] dt: cpufreq: st: Provide bindings for ST's CPUFreq implementation

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Tue Jun 23 2015 - 05:00:30 EST


On 23-06-15, 09:38, Lee Jones wrote:
> Do you always write your documentation before implementing a
> feature?
>
> Surely it goes;
> Requirements Gathering
> Plan and Prepare
> Implement
> Test
> Document
> Deliver
>
> ;)

DT bindings aren't just simple documentation of how things are
working. I do things in the way you wrote earlier though :)

> That's not what it looks like to me:
>
> git grep -C20 "compatible.*cpufreq" -- arch

Yeah, that's wrong. They got in much earlier and the bindings weren't
well thought through.

But they are discouraged today ..

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/