Re: [PATCH] cpufreq:gx-suspmod - Fix two typos in two comments.

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, May 25, 2015 12:51:14 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 23-05-15, 10:36, Shailendra Verma wrote:
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c |    4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c b/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c
> > index 1d723dc..3488c9c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c
> > @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ module_param(max_duration, int, 0444);
> >  
> >  
> >  /**
> > - * we can detect a core multipiler from dir0_lsb
> > + * we can detect a core multiplier from dir0_lsb
> >   * from GX1 datasheet p.56,
> >   *	MULT[3:0]:
> >   *	0000 = SYSCLK multiplied by 4 (test only)
> > @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static int cpufreq_gx_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >  
> >  	/* it needs to be assured that at least one supported frequency is
> >  	 * within policy->min and policy->max. If it is not, policy->max
> > -	 * needs to be increased until one freuqency is supported.
> > +	 * needs to be increased until one frequency is supported.
> >  	 * policy->min may not be decreased, though. This way we guarantee a
> >  	 * specific processing capacity.
> >  	 */
> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

Queued up for 4.2, thanks!


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/