Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] x86, mwaitt: add monitorx and mwaitx instruction

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon Jun 15 2015 - 06:56:01 EST


On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 06:48:03PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> +/*
> + * MWAITT allows for both a timer value to get you out of the MWAIT as
> + * well as the normal exit conditions.
> + *
> + * MWAITX ECX[1]: enable timer if set
> + * MWAITX EBX[31:0]: max wait time expressed in SW P0 clocks
> + *
> + * Below is the compared data between MWAIT and MWAITX on AMD
> + * processors:
> + * MWAIT MWAITX
> + * opcode 0f 01 c9 | 0f 01 fb
> + * ECX[0] value of RFLAGS.IF seen by instruction
> + * ECX[1] unused/#GP if set | enable timer if set
> + * ECX[31:2] unused/#GP if set
> + * EAX unused (reserve for hint)

Seeing how you're stuffing a !0 value in here in the next patch, the
above comment seems slightly incorrect, no?

> + * EBX[31:0] unused | max wait time (loops)
> + *
> + * MONITOR MONITORX
> + * opcode 0f 01 c8 | 0f 01 fa
> + * EAX (logical) address to monitor
> + * ECX #GP if not zero
> + *
> + * The software P0 frequency is the same as the TSC frequency.
> + */
> +static inline void __mwaitx(unsigned long eax, unsigned long ebx,
> + unsigned long ecx)
> +{
> + /* "mwaitx %eax, %ebx, %ecx;" */
> + asm volatile(".byte 0x0f, 0x01, 0xfb;"
> + :: "a" (eax), "b" (ebx), "c" (ecx));
> +}
> +
> static inline void __sti_mwait(unsigned long eax, unsigned long ecx)
> {
> trace_hardirqs_on();
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/