Re: [Intel-gfx] [BUG, bisect] Re: drm/i915: WARN_ON(dev_priv->mm.busy)

[Jani Nikula]

On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Ville SyrjÃlà <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 01:25:38AM -0700, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
>> Daniel,
>> 
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 08:57:47AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > Can you please retest with
>> > 
>> > commit 0aedb1626566efd72b369c01992ee7413c82a0c5
>> > Author: Ville SyrjÃlà <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Date:   Thu May 28 18:32:36 2015 +0300
>> > 
>> >     drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty
>> > 
>> > Thanks, Daniel
>> > 
>> 
>> The bug is still present with that patch applied.  And it is still
>> present up to linux-next 20150611.
>
> The patch was misapplied, so what's in the tree at the moment isn't what
> I sent to the list.

Auch, my bad.

So we should

1) revert

commit 0aedb1626566efd72b369c01992ee7413c82a0c5
Author: Ville SyrjÃlà <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu May 28 18:32:36 2015 +0300

    drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty

in v4.1

and

2) reapply http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/50659 to
drm-intel-next-fixes for v4.2.

Is that right?

BR,
Jani.


>
> -- 
> Ville SyrjÃlÃ
> Intel OTC

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/