Re: latency histogram with BPF

[Daniel Wagner]

On 06/12/2015 08:12 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On 06/12/2015 12:08 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> On 6/11/15 12:25 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> If you have any suggestions on where to look, I'm all ears.
>> My stack traces look like:
>> Running with 10*40 (== 400) tasks.
>> [   12.032571] kernel BUG at ../mm/slub.c:3413!

I hit this as well.

After looking and playing around for while I think I found the source of
the problem: The path from the BPF program into the hash table code is
triggering the crash.

Attaching kprobes to trace_preempt_[on|off] works fine. Empty BPF
programs connected to the probes is no problem as well. So I changed the
BPF program to use only arrays instead of hash tables. No crash anymore.

Thanks Steven for the tip :)

I suspect the hash table code will call trace_preempt_[off|on]
eventually and that is not going to fly.

The program is still in a rough state. I'll send an cleanup version next
week. (My brain is melting down, too hot here...)

cheers,
daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/