[for-next][PATCH 3/3] ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer

[Steven Rostedt]

From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@xxxxxxxxxx>

The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority,
so correct it.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@xxxxxxxxxx

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 2.6.33+
Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
index 2430563cf2bc..61b933bfd2b8 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_init(void)
 
 	if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
 		struct sched_param param = {
-			.sched_priority = consumer_fifo
+			.sched_priority = producer_fifo
 		};
 		sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
 	} else
-- 
2.1.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/