[PATCH 16/18] lockdep: Simplify lock_release()

[Peter Zijlstra]

lock_release() takes this nested argument that's mostly pointless
these days, remove the implementation but leave the argument a
rudiment for now.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c |  119 +++++++----------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -3260,26 +3260,6 @@ print_unlock_imbalance_bug(struct task_s
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/*
- * Common debugging checks for both nested and non-nested unlock:
- */
-static int check_unlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
-			unsigned long ip)
-{
-	if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
-		return 0;
-	/*
-	 * Lockdep should run with IRQs disabled, recursion, head-ache, etc..
-	 */
-	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()))
-		return 0;
-
-	if (curr->lockdep_depth <= 0)
-		return print_unlock_imbalance_bug(curr, lock, ip);
-
-	return 1;
-}
-
 static int match_held_lock(struct held_lock *hlock, struct lockdep_map *lock)
 {
 	if (hlock->instance == lock)
@@ -3376,31 +3356,35 @@ __lock_set_class(struct lockdep_map *loc
 }
 
 /*
- * Remove the lock to the list of currently held locks in a
- * potentially non-nested (out of order) manner. This is a
- * relatively rare operation, as all the unlock APIs default
- * to nested mode (which uses lock_release()):
+ * Remove the lock to the list of currently held locks - this gets
+ * called on mutex_unlock()/spin_unlock*() (or on a failed
+ * mutex_lock_interruptible()).
+ *
+ * @nested is an hysterical artifact, needs a tree wide cleanup.
  */
 static int
-lock_release_non_nested(struct task_struct *curr,
-			struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip)
+__lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lock, int nested, unsigned long ip)
 {
+	struct task_struct *curr = current;
 	struct held_lock *hlock, *prev_hlock;
 	unsigned int depth;
 	int i;
 
-	/*
-	 * Check whether the lock exists in the current stack
-	 * of held locks:
-	 */
+	if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
+		return 0;
+
 	depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
 	/*
 	 * So we're all set to release this lock.. wait what lock? We don't
 	 * own any locks, you've been drinking again?
 	 */
-	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!depth))
-		return 0;
+	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(depth <= 0))
+		 return print_unlock_imbalance_bug(curr, lock, ip);
 
+	/*
+	 * Check whether the lock exists in the current stack
+	 * of held locks:
+	 */
 	prev_hlock = NULL;
 	for (i = depth-1; i >= 0; i--) {
 		hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
@@ -3456,78 +3440,10 @@ lock_release_non_nested(struct task_stru
 	 */
 	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_depth != depth - 1))
 		return 0;
-	return 1;
-}
 
-/*
- * Remove the lock to the list of currently held locks - this gets
- * called on mutex_unlock()/spin_unlock*() (or on a failed
- * mutex_lock_interruptible()). This is done for unlocks that nest
- * perfectly. (i.e. the current top of the lock-stack is unlocked)
- */
-static int lock_release_nested(struct task_struct *curr,
-			       struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip)
-{
-	struct held_lock *hlock;
-	unsigned int depth;
-
-	/*
-	 * Pop off the top of the lock stack:
-	 */
-	depth = curr->lockdep_depth - 1;
-	hlock = curr->held_locks + depth;
-
-	/*
-	 * Is the unlock non-nested:
-	 */
-	if (hlock->instance != lock || hlock->references)
-		return lock_release_non_nested(curr, lock, ip);
-	curr->lockdep_depth--;
-
-	/*
-	 * No more locks, but somehow we've got hash left over, who left it?
-	 */
-	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!depth && (hlock->prev_chain_key != 0)))
-		return 0;
-
-	curr->curr_chain_key = hlock->prev_chain_key;
-
-	lock_release_holdtime(hlock);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP
-	hlock->prev_chain_key = 0;
-	hlock->class_idx = 0;
-	hlock->acquire_ip = 0;
-	hlock->irq_context = 0;
-#endif
 	return 1;
 }
 
-/*
- * Remove the lock to the list of currently held locks - this gets
- * called on mutex_unlock()/spin_unlock*() (or on a failed
- * mutex_lock_interruptible()). This is done for unlocks that nest
- * perfectly. (i.e. the current top of the lock-stack is unlocked)
- */
-static void
-__lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lock, int nested, unsigned long ip)
-{
-	struct task_struct *curr = current;
-
-	if (!check_unlock(curr, lock, ip))
-		return;
-
-	if (nested) {
-		if (!lock_release_nested(curr, lock, ip))
-			return;
-	} else {
-		if (!lock_release_non_nested(curr, lock, ip))
-			return;
-	}
-
-	check_chain_key(curr);
-}
-
 static int __lock_is_held(struct lockdep_map *lock)
 {
 	struct task_struct *curr = current;
@@ -3639,7 +3555,8 @@ void lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lo
 	check_flags(flags);
 	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
 	trace_lock_release(lock, ip);
-	__lock_release(lock, nested, ip);
+	if (__lock_release(lock, nested, ip))
+		check_chain_key(current);
 	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/