Re: [PATCH] clk: fixed: Add comment to clk_fixed_set_rate

[Stephen Boyd]

On 06/10, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> Currently it is not made explicit why clk_fixed_set_rate() can ignore
> its arguments and unconditionally return success. Add a comment
> to explain this.
> 
> We also mark the clk_ops table const since it should never be
> modified at runtime.
> 
> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Applied to clk-next

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/