Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add NUMA support for NVDIMM devices

From: Dan Williams
Date: Wed Jun 10 2015 - 12:38:23 EST


On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
<Elliott@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Linux-nvdimm [mailto:linux-nvdimm-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>> Dan Williams
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 9:58 AM
>> To: Jeff Moyer
>> Cc: linux-nvdimm; Rafael J. Wysocki; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Linux
>> ACPI
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add NUMA support for NVDIMM devices
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx> writes:
>> >
>> >> Since NVDIMMs are installed on memory slots, they expose the NUMA
>> >> topology of a platform. This patchset adds support of sysfs
>> >> 'numa_node' to I/O-related NVDIMM devices under /sys/bus/nd/devices.
>> >> This enables numactl(8) to accept 'block:' and 'file:' paths of
>> >> pmem and btt devices as shown in the examples below.
>> >> numactl --preferred block:pmem0 --show
>> >> numactl --preferred file:/dev/pmem0s --show
>> >>
>> >> numactl can be used to bind an application to the locality of
>> >> a target NVDIMM for better performance. Here is a result of fio
>> >> benchmark to ext4/dax on an HP DL380 with 2 sockets for local and
>> >> remote settings.
>> >>
>> >> Local [1] : 4098.3MB/s
>> >> Remote [2]: 3718.4MB/s
>> >>
>> >> [1] numactl --preferred block:pmem0 --cpunodebind block:pmem0 fio <fs-
>> on-pmem0>
>> >> [2] numactl --preferred block:pmem1 --cpunodebind block:pmem1 fio <fs-
>> on-pmem0>
>> >
>> > Did you post the patches to numactl somewhere?
>> >
>>
>> numactl already supports this today.
>
> numactl does have a bug handling partitions under these devices,
> because it assumes all storage devices have "/devices/pci"
> in their path as it tries to find the parent device for the
> partition. I think we'll propose a numactl patch for that;
> I don't think the drivers can fool it.
>
> Details (from an earlier version of the patch series
> in which btt devices were named /dev/nd1, etc.):
>
> strace shows that numactl is trying to find numa_node in very
> different locations for /dev/nd1p1 vs. /dev/sda1.
>
> strace for /dev/nd1p1
> =====================
> open("/sys/class/block/nd1p1/dev", O_RDONLY) = 4
> read(4, "259:1\n", 4095) = 6
> close(4) = 0
> close(3) = 0
> readlink("/sys/class/block/nd1p1", "../../devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYB"..., 1024) = 77
> open("/sys/class/block/nd1p1/device/numa_node", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
>
> strace for /dev/sda1
> ====================
> open("/sys/class/block/sda1/dev", O_RDONLY) = 4
> read(4, "8:1\n", 4095) = 4
> close(4) = 0
> close(3) = 0
> readlink("/sys/class/block/sda1", "../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00"..., 1024) = 91
> open("/sys//devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0//numa_node", O_RDONLY) = 3
> read(3, "0\n", 4095) = 2
> close(3) = 0
>
> The "sys/class/block/xxx" paths link to:
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 May 20 20:42 /sys/class/block/nd1p1 -> ../../devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0012:00/ndbus0/btt1/block/nd1/nd1p1
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 May 20 20:41 /sys/class/block/sda1 -> ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:03:00.0/host6/target6:0:0/6:0:0:0/block/sda/sda1
>
>
> For /dev/sda1, numactl recognizes "/devices/pci" as
> a special path, and strips off everything after the
> numbers. Faced with:
> ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:03:00.0/host6/target6:0:0/6:0:0:0/block/sda/sda1
>
> it ends up with this (leaving a sloppy "//" in the path):
> /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0//numa_node
>
> It would also succeed if it ended up with this:
> /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:03:00.0/numa_node
>
> For /dev/nd1p1 it does not see that string, so just
> tries to open "/sys/class/block/nd1p1/device/numa_node"
>
> There are no "device/" subdirectories in the tree for
> partition devices (for either sda1 or nd1p1), so this
> fails.
>
>
> From http://oss.sgi.com/projects/libnuma/
> numactl affinity.c:
> /* Somewhat hackish: extract device from symlink path.
> Better would be a direct backlink. This knows slightly too
> much about the actual sysfs layout. */
> char path[1024];
> char *fn = NULL;
> if (asprintf(&fn, "/sys/class/%s/%s", cls, dev) > 0 &&
> readlink(fn, path, sizeof path) > 0) {
> regex_t re;
> regmatch_t match[2];
> char *p;
>
> regcomp(&re, "(/devices/pci[0-9a-fA-F:/]+\\.[0-9]+)/",
> REG_EXTENDED);
> ret = regexec(&re, path, 2, match, 0);
> regfree(&re);
> if (ret == 0) {
> free(fn);
> assert(match[0].rm_so > 0);
> assert(match[0].rm_eo > 0);
> path[match[1].rm_eo + 1] = 0;
> p = path + match[0].rm_so;
> ret = sysfs_node_read(mask, "/sys/%s/numa_node", p);
> if (ret < 0)
> return node_parse_failure(ret, NULL, p);
> return ret;
> }
> }
> free(fn);
>
> ret = sysfs_node_read(mask, "/sys/class/%s/%s/device/numa_node",
> cls, dev);

I think it is broken to try go from /sys/class down it should go from
the device node up. I.e. from the resolved path of
/sys/dev/block/<major>:<minor>, and then walk up the directory tree to
the parent of block.

$ readlink -f /sys/dev/block/8\:1/
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.2/ata1/host0/target0:0:0/0:0:0:0/block/sda/sda1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/