[PATCH] cpufreq, Fix overflow in busy_scaled due to long delay
From: Prarit Bhargava
Date: Wed Jun 10 2015 - 09:19:02 EST
I looked into switching to div64_s64() instead of the 32-bit version in
div_fp(), however, this would result in sample_ratio and core_busy returning
0 which is something we don't want.
P.
---8<---
The kernel may delay interrupts for a long time which can result in timers
being delayed. If this occurs the intel_pstate driver will crash with
a divide by zero error:
divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP
Modules linked in: btrfs zlib_deflate raid6_pq xor msdos ext4 mbcache jbd2 binfmt_misc arc4 md4 nls_utf8 cifs dns_resolver tcp_lp bnep bluetooth rfkill fuse dm_service_time iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf_conntrack_broadcast nf_conntrack_ftp ip6t_rpfilter ip6t_REJECT ipt_REJECT xt_conntrack ebtable_nat ebtable_broute bridge stp llc ebtable_filter ebtables ip6table_nat nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_nat_ipv6 ip6table_mangle ip6table_security ip6table_raw ip6table_filter ip6_tables iptable_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat nf_conntrack iptable_mangle iptable_security iptable_raw iptable_filter ip_tables intel_powerclamp coretemp vfat fat kvm_intel iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support ipmi_devintf sr_mod kvm crct10dif_pclmul
crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel cdc_ether lrw usbnet cdrom mii gf128mul glue_helper ablk_helper cryptd lpc_ich mfd_core pcspkr sb_edac edac_core ipmi_si ipmi_msghandler ioatdma wmi shpchp acpi_pad nfsd auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd uinput dm_multipath sunrpc xfs libcrc32c usb_storage sd_mod crc_t10dif crct10dif_common ixgbe mgag200 syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mdio drm_kms_helper ttm igb drm ptp pps_core dca i2c_algo_bit megaraid_sas i2c_core dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
CPU: 113 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/113 Tainted: G W -------------- 3.10.0-229.1.2.el7.x86_64 #1
Hardware name: IBM x3950 X6 -[3837AC2]-/00FN827, BIOS -[A8E112BUS-1.00]- 08/27/2014
task: ffff880fe8abe660 ti: ffff880fe8ae4000 task.ti: ffff880fe8ae4000
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff814a9279>] [<ffffffff814a9279>] intel_pstate_timer_func+0x179/0x3d0
RSP: 0018:ffff883fff4e3db8 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: 0000000027100000 RBX: ffff883fe6965100 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: 000000002e53632d
RBP: ffff883fff4e3e20 R08: 000e6f69a5a125c0 R09: ffff883fe84ec001
R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000005 R12: 00000000000049f5
R13: 0000000000271000 R14: 00000000000049f5 R15: 0000000000000246
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff883fff4e0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f7668601000 CR3: 000000000190a000 CR4: 00000000001407e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Stack:
ffff883fff4e3e58 ffffffff81099dc1 0000000000000086 0000000000000071
ffff883fff4f3680 0000000000000071 fbdc8a965e33afee ffffffff810b69dd
ffff883fe84ec000 ffff883fe6965108 0000000000000100 ffffffff814a9100
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
[<ffffffff81099dc1>] ? run_posix_cpu_timers+0x51/0x840
[<ffffffff810b69dd>] ? trigger_load_balance+0x5d/0x200
[<ffffffff814a9100>] ? pid_param_set+0x130/0x130
[<ffffffff8107df56>] call_timer_fn+0x36/0x110
[<ffffffff814a9100>] ? pid_param_set+0x130/0x130
[<ffffffff8107fdcf>] run_timer_softirq+0x21f/0x320
[<ffffffff81077b2f>] __do_softirq+0xef/0x280
[<ffffffff816156dc>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[<ffffffff81015d95>] do_softirq+0x65/0xa0
[<ffffffff81077ec5>] irq_exit+0x115/0x120
[<ffffffff81616355>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x45/0x60
[<ffffffff81614a1d>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x80
<EOI>
[<ffffffff814a9c32>] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0x52/0xc0
[<ffffffff814a9c28>] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0x48/0xc0
[<ffffffff814a9d65>] cpuidle_idle_call+0xc5/0x200
[<ffffffff8101d14e>] arch_cpu_idle+0xe/0x30
[<ffffffff810c67c1>] cpu_startup_entry+0xf1/0x290
[<ffffffff8104228a>] start_secondary+0x1ba/0x230
Code: 42 0f 00 45 89 e6 48 01 c2 43 8d 44 6d 00 39 d0 73 26 49 c1 e5 08 89 d2 4d 63 f4 49 63 c5 48 c1 e2 08 48 c1 e0 08 48 63 ca 48 99 <48> f7 f9 48 98 4c 0f af f0 49 c1 ee 08 8b 43 78 c1 e0 08 44 29
RIP [<ffffffff814a9279>] intel_pstate_timer_func+0x179/0x3d0
RSP <ffff883fff4e3db8>
The kernel values for cpudata for CPU 113 were:
struct cpudata {
cpu = 113,
timer = {
entry = {
next = 0x0,
prev = 0xdead000000200200
},
expires = 8357799745,
base = 0xffff883fe84ec001,
function = 0xffffffff814a9100 <intel_pstate_timer_func>,
data = 18446612406765768960,
<snip>
i_gain = 0,
d_gain = 0,
deadband = 0,
last_err = 22489
},
last_sample_time = {
tv64 = 4063132438017305
},
prev_aperf = 287326796397463,
prev_mperf = 251427432090198,
sample = {
core_pct_busy = 23081,
aperf = 2937407,
mperf = 3257884,
freq = 2524484,
time = {
tv64 = 4063149215234118
}
}
}
which results in the time between samples = last_sample_time - sample.time
= 4063149215234118 - 4063132438017305 = 16777216813 which is 16.777 seconds.
The duration between reads of the APERF and MPERF registers overflowed a s32
sized integer in intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy()'s call to div_fp(). The result
is that int_tofp(duration_us) == 0, and the kernel attempts to divide by 0.
While the kernel shouldn't be delaying for a long time, it can and does
happen, and the intel_pstate driver should not panic in this situation. This
patch checks for an overflow and ignores the current calculation cycle by
returning -EINVAL. Since intel_pstate_sample() has been called, subsequent
timer function calls will then again pick up the correct calculations and the
system will continue functioning properly.
Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index 6414661..6a145e5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -823,6 +823,9 @@ static inline int32_t intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy(struct cpudata *cpu)
sample_time = pid_params.sample_rate_ms * USEC_PER_MSEC;
duration_us = (u32) ktime_us_delta(cpu->sample.time,
cpu->last_sample_time);
+ if (duration_us > S32_MAX)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (duration_us > sample_time * 3) {
sample_ratio = div_fp(int_tofp(sample_time),
int_tofp(duration_us));
@@ -832,7 +835,7 @@ static inline int32_t intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy(struct cpudata *cpu)
return core_busy;
}
-static inline void intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu)
+static inline int32_t intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu)
{
int32_t busy_scaled;
struct _pid *pid;
@@ -840,11 +843,15 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu)
pid = &cpu->pid;
busy_scaled = intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy(cpu);
+ if (busy_scaled < 0)
+ return S32_MAX;
ctl = pid_calc(pid, busy_scaled);
/* Negative values of ctl increase the pstate and vice versa */
intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate - ctl);
+
+ return busy_scaled;
}
static void intel_hwp_timer_func(unsigned long __data)
@@ -859,15 +866,16 @@ static void intel_pstate_timer_func(unsigned long __data)
{
struct cpudata *cpu = (struct cpudata *) __data;
struct sample *sample;
+ int32_t busy_scaled;
intel_pstate_sample(cpu);
sample = &cpu->sample;
- intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(cpu);
+ busy_scaled = intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(cpu);
trace_pstate_sample(fp_toint(sample->core_pct_busy),
- fp_toint(intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy(cpu)),
+ fp_toint(busy_scaled),
cpu->pstate.current_pstate,
sample->mperf,
sample->aperf,
--
1.7.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/