Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] fs: kiocb: introduce IOCB_DONT_DIRTY_PAGE flag for direct IO

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:42:33AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Both ITER_KVEC and ITER_BVEC doesn't mean the pages are kernel
> page, for example of loop and swap. That is why this patch is more flexiable,
> and won't cause regression since the users may have different dirtying
> rules as you mentioned last time.
> 
> http://marc.info/?t=143093223200001&r=1&w=2

Again, we never dirty pages for the caller when doing general purpose
kernel I/O.  For loop we either don't need it (totally in-kernel block
I/O) or the caller takes care of it (direct I/O on the loop device).

The swap code currently only uses ->direct_IO and thus isn't affected
by this flag.  If we use it for write the low-level I/O code should not
dirty the page either.

So to repeat myself: for the current state of affairs adding a flag
that every sensible user has to set is a horrible interface.  If for
some unforseen reason we'll need the flag later on it should have
reverse polarity, and only be added when needed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/