Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] arch: introduce memremap_cache() and memremap_wt()

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Existing users of ioremap_cache() are mapping memory that is known in
> advance to not have i/o side effects.  These users are forced to cast
> away the __iomem annotation, or otherwise neglect to fix the sparse
> errors thrown when dereferencing pointers to this memory.  Provide
> memremap_*() as a non __iomem annotated ioremap_*().
>
> The ARCH_HAS_MEMREMAP kconfig symbol is introduced for archs to assert
> that it is safe to recast / reuse the return value from ioremap as a
> normal pointer to memory.  In other words, archs that mandate specific
> accessors for __iomem are not memremap() capable and drivers that care,
> like pmem, can add a dependency to disable themselves on these archs.

One minor comment. Otherwise looks good for me.

[]

> --- a/kernel/resource.c
> +++ b/kernel/resource.c

> @@ -528,6 +528,45 @@ int region_is_ram(resource_size_t start, unsigned long size)
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEMREMAP
> +/*
> + * memremap() is "ioremap" for cases where it is known that the resource
> + * being mapped does not have i/o side effects and the __iomem
> + * annotation is not applicable.
> + */
> +static bool memremap_valid(resource_size_t offset, size_t size)
> +{
> +       if (region_is_ram(offset, size) != 0) {
> +               WARN_ONCE(1, "memremap attempted on ram %pa size: %zd\n",

%zu

> +                               &offset, size);
> +               return false;
> +       }
> +       return true;
> +}


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/