Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] staging: lustre: lnet: code cleanups

[Michael Shuey]

Ah - that explains it.  I added additional files to the series, but
simply re-applied the original round of patches.  They would've not
been tagged as v4, while the patches pertaining to the newly-modified
files had v4 in the subject.

I'll be more thorough in future patch revisions.  Thanks for the explanation.
--
Mike Shuey


On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Sudip Mukherjee
<sudipm.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 08:09:54AM -0400, Michael Shuey wrote:
>> BTW, you keep mentioning a v5 that I sent.  Where is that, exactly?
>> The last round of patches I sent I've kept labeled as "PATCH v4", and
>> I only hit git send-email once.  Could you forward me something from
>> this v5 series, so I could see if anything is amiss on my end?
>
> I think it was not a v5. But what happened is in your series some
> of the patches were marked as v4 and some were not having any version
> so it appeared like a fresh series again. Like 1/13,2/13,3/13 has v4
> but the others donot have a version.
>
> regards
> sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/