Re: [PATCH 0/8] MODSIGN: Use PKCS#7 for module signatures [ver #4]

[David Howells]

Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Without tagging the purpose of the signed file, you simply don't have
> a cryptographic guarantee of that.  The bad guy can load something
> else that was signed for an entirely different purpose into the wrong
> device, possibly crashing it, causing buffer overflows because the
> format is wrong, or doing any number of other bad things.

One suggestion David Woodhouse made with regard to tagging is that the tag
could just be added into the digest before it is signed/verified and not
actually stored in the signature.

This means that if you try loading the firmware for the wrong request, the
signature verification will fail.

It's an interesting approach that's simple to achieve, but it has the downside
that the signature will be invalid in the mismatch situation and you can't
tell whether it's because the module is being misused or the signature is just
wrong.  However, that might be livable with.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/