Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Stop relying on magic jmp behavior for early_idt_handlers

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri May 22 2015 - 02:22:35 EST



* Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/segment.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/segment.h
> @@ -231,9 +231,17 @@
> #define TLS_SIZE (GDT_ENTRY_TLS_ENTRIES* 8)
>
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
> +
> +/*
> + * early_idt_handlers is an array of entry points. For simplicity, it's
> + * a real array. We allocate nine bytes for each entry: two one-byte
> + * push instructions and a five-byte jump in the worst case.
> + */
> +#define EARLY_IDT_HANDLER_STRIDE 9

So how come that two plus five equals nine? ;-)

It's two two-bype pushes (sometimes a 2-byte NOP), plus a 5-byte jump,
in the worst case.

I'd also mention that it's an array of 32 small trampolines that set
up parameters and jump to a common entry point.

> +/* Build the early_idt_handlers array */
> ENTRY(early_idt_handlers)

Please rename the function accordingly: early_idt_handlers_array, to
make clear this is never jumped to directly, only through the IDT.

> # 36(%esp) %eflags
> # 32(%esp) %cs
> @@ -531,19 +532,18 @@ ENTRY(early_idt_handlers)
> # 24(%rsp) error code
> i = 0
> .rept NUM_EXCEPTION_VECTORS
> - .if (EXCEPTION_ERRCODE_MASK >> i) & 1
> - ASM_NOP2
> - .else
> + .fill early_idt_handlers + i * EARLY_IDT_HANDLER_STRIDE - ., 1, 0xcc
> + .ifeq (EXCEPTION_ERRCODE_MASK >> i) & 1
> pushl $0 # Dummy error code, to make stack frame uniform
> .endif
> pushl $i # 20(%esp) Vector number
> jmp early_idt_handler
> i = i + 1
> .endr
> + .fill early_idt_handlers + i * EARLY_IDT_HANDLER_STRIDE - ., 1, 0xcc
> ENDPROC(early_idt_handlers)
>
> - /* This is global to keep gas from relaxing the jumps */
> -ENTRY(early_idt_handler)
> +early_idt_handler:

Please rename this as well to make it clearer what's happening,
something like:

early_idt_handler_common:

would work for me.

Ditto for the 64-bit side.

Thanks,

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/