Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver

From: Fu Wei
Date: Fri May 22 2015 - 01:05:52 EST


Hi Timur.

On 22 May 2015 at 00:33, Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/21/2015 11:12 AM, Fu Wei wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >Having said that, my personal preference would be for the counter
>>> >and rate to be exported through the clock subsystem (ie with
>>> >clk_get_rate). But that would still not provide the current counter
>>> >value, so maybe that isn't even possible.
>>
>> I will try to make a patch for this, If the arm maintainers don't like
>> exporting "arch_timer_get_rate();"
>>
>> But your thought is good, the clk_get_rate is the best way to do for now
>
>
> The rate isn't the problem. It's the current timestamp counter. The only
> way to get that is with either arch_counter_get_cntvct() or
> arch_timer_read_counter(). I'm not sure which of the two functions is
> better. However, arch_timer_read_counter() is really just a function
> pointer that points to arch_counter_get_cntvct().
>
> Also, clk_get_rate() only works if you have a real clk object. I've said
> this before many times, but on my ACPI platform, there are no clk objects.
> Clocks are handled by UEFI.

Thanks for your info,
I think : right now , do what we can do, export the interface of arch_timer,
If the arm maintainers don't like this way, we can find another way
later or find a option as plan B.

>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
> Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.



--
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch
Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct)
Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile)
Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15,
One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District,
Shanghai,China 200021
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/