Re: [PATCH] NVMe: nvme_queue made cache friendly.

From: Parav Pandit
Date: Wed May 20 2015 - 09:34:14 EST


On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 02:01:03PM -0400, Parav Pandit wrote:
>> nvme_queue structure made 64B cache friendly so that majority of the
>> data elements of the structure during IO and completion path can be
>> found in typical single 64B cache line size which was previously spanning beyond
>> single 64B cache line size.
>
> Have you done any performance measurements on this?

I have not done the performance test yet.

> I find it hard to
> believe that moving q_lock to the second 64B cache line results in a
> performance improvement.

Newly aligned structure including q_lock actually fits completely in
first 64 bytes. Did I miss anything in calculation?
q_lock appears to be taken at the end of the IO processing, which
means by than sq_cmds, hctx etc fields are already accessed in same
line.
May be I should move it after q_db, instead of last element?


> Seems to me it would result in a performance
> loss, since you have to grab the lock before operating on the queue,
> and cache line prefetching tends to prefetch the _next_ line, not the
> _previous_ line.
>
>> @@ -98,23 +98,23 @@ struct async_cmd_info {
>> struct nvme_queue {
>> struct device *q_dmadev;
>> struct nvme_dev *dev;
>> - char irqname[24]; /* nvme4294967295-65535\0 */
>> - spinlock_t q_lock;
>> struct nvme_command *sq_cmds;
>> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
>> volatile struct nvme_completion *cqes;
>> - dma_addr_t sq_dma_addr;
>> - dma_addr_t cq_dma_addr;
>> u32 __iomem *q_db;
>> u16 q_depth;
>> - s16 cq_vector;
>> u16 sq_head;
>> u16 sq_tail;
>> u16 cq_head;
>> u16 qid;
>> + s16 cq_vector;
>> u8 cq_phase;
>> u8 cqe_seen;
>> + spinlock_t q_lock;
>> struct async_cmd_info cmdinfo;
>> - struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
>> + char irqname[24]; /* nvme4294967295-65535\0 */
>> + dma_addr_t sq_dma_addr;
>> + dma_addr_t cq_dma_addr;
>> };
>>
>> /*
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/