Re: [PATCH -rfc 4/4] locking/rtmutex: Support spin on owner (osq)

[Paul Bolle]

(This is pasted as an RFC, so you probably don't want feedback going
into detail yet, but I couldn't help spotting this.)

On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 10:24 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> --- a/kernel/Kconfig.locks
> +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.locks

> +config RT_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER
> +	def_bool y
> +	depends on SMP && RT_MUTEXES && !CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES && ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW

s/CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES/DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES/?

Or perhaps even drop "&& !CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES" entirely, because
that test currently always evaluates to true, so it might not be needed.

Running 
   scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py --diff $sha1..$sha2

helps catching typos like this.


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/