Re: Should we automatically generate a module signing key at all?

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I think we should get rid of the idea of automatically generated signing
>> keys entirely.  Instead I think we should generate, at build time, a list of
>> all the module hashes and link that into vmlinux.
>
> Ugh. I think that would be a mistake. It doesn't add any new security
> (it's 100% equivalent to just using a throw-away key), and it adds new
> complexity and a new ordering dependency.
>
> Yes, yes, "throwing away the key" is a somewhat gray area, and just
> unlinking the key-file without any secure erase in theory makes it
> recoverable. In practice, though, it is fine. If you have an attacker
> that has raw access to your disk and almost infinite resources, they
> have easier ways to make your life miserable.

Throwing away the key is outright impossible in some contexts.

https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/