Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:13:55AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

> In future, for yourself and anyone else who is following this thread
> for 'fun', if a patch crosses multiple subsystems (which I try to keep
> to a minimum) it's probably best to indicate that in the subject line.

> mfd: regulator: <blah>

> ... would definitely get Marks attention.  And yes, I know 'regulator'
> is mentioned in the subject line of the particular patch. :)

Yeah, sadly it's not visible in the thread view in mutt here since it's
too late in the subject line.  That is good advice, though - the
standard thing is either like you describe or "mfd/regulator: ".

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature