Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / sleep: Make suspend-to-idle-specific code depend on CONFIG_SUSPEND

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Sat, 16 May 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Since idle_should_freeze() is defined to always return 'false'
> for CONFIG_SUSPEND unset, all of the code depending on it in
> cpuidle_idle_call() is not necessary in that case.
> 
> Make that code depend on CONFIG_SUSPEND too to avoid building it
> when it is not going to be used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>

ACK for the tick part.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/