Re: [PATCH 2/2] extcon: Update the prototype of extcon_register_notifier() with enum extcon

[Chanwoo Choi]

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2015-05-15 23:31 GMT+09:00 Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> Previously, extcon consumer driver used the extcon_register_interest()
>> to register the notifier chain and then to receive the notifier event
>> when external connector's state is changed. When registering the notifier chain
>> for specific external connector with extcon_register_interest(), it used the
>> the string name of external connector directly. There are potential problem
>> because of unclear, non-standard and inconsequent cable name. Namely,
>> it is not appropriate method to identify each external connector.
>>
>> So, this patch modify the prototype of extcon_register_notifier() by using
>> the 'enum extcon' which are the unique id for each external connector
>> instead of unclear string method.
>>
>> - Previously, the extcon consumer driver used the extcon_register_interest()
>> with 'cable_name' to point out the specific external connector. Also. it used
>> the un-needed structure (struct extcon_specific_cable_nb).
>> : int extcon_register_interest(struct extcon_specific_cable_nb *obj,
>>                              const char *extcon_name, const char *cable_name,
>>                              struct notifier_block *nb)
>>
>> - Newly, the updated extcon_register_notifier() would definitely support
>> the same feature to detech the changed state of external connector without
>> any specific structure (struct extcon_specific_cable_nb).
>> : int extcon_register_notifier(struct extcon_dev *edev, enum extcon id,
>>                              struct notifier_block *nb)
>>
>> This patch support the both extcon_register_interest() and new extcon_register_
>> notifier(). But the extcon_{register|unregister}_interest() will be deprecated
>> because extcon core would support the notifier event for extcon consumer driver
>> with only updated extcon_register_notifier() and 'extcon_specific_cable_nb'
>> will be removed if there are no extcon consumer driver with legacy
>> extcon_{register|unregister}_interest().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: George Cherian <george.cherian@xxxxxx>
>> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
>> Cc: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/extcon/extcon.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>  include/linux/extcon.h  | 17 +++++----
>>  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
>> index 4aeb585..14c8c95 100644
>> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
>> @@ -111,6 +111,16 @@ static int check_mutually_exclusive(struct extcon_dev *edev, u32 new_state)
>>         return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> +static bool is_extcon_changed(u32 prev, u32 new, int idx, bool *attached)
>> +{
>> +       if (((prev >> idx) & 0x1) != ((new >> idx) & 0x1)) {
>
> How about switching "state" to unsigned long and using bit operations
> everywhere, like test_bit()?

As I replied on other patch, I'm having the plan to extend the number
of supported external connectors of each extcon device. I'll consider
to use the test_bit() on next time for updating extcon core.

>
> The patch itself looks good and change above is not actually related
> to the code here, so:
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/