Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)

[Daniel Phillips]

On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 1:25:38 PM PDT, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2015, 12:37:41 schrieb Daniel Phillips:
> > On 05/13/2015 12:09 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: ...
>
> Daniel, if you want to change the process of patch review and 
> inclusion into 
> the kernel, model an example of how you would like it to be. This has way 
> better chances to inspire others to change their behaviors themselves than 
> accusing them of bad faith.
>
> Its yours to choose. 
>
> What outcome do you want to create?

The outcome I would like is:

 * Everybody has a good think about what has gone wrong in the past,
   not only with troublesome submitters, but with mutual respect and
   collegial conduct.

 * Tux3 is merged on its merits so we get more developers and
   testers and move it along faster.

 * I left LKML better than I found it.

 * Group hugs

Well, group hugs are optional, that one would be situational.

Regards,

Daniel
   

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/