Re: [PATCH 1/1] OpenRISC: Fix kernel build problem on OpenRISC

From: Paul Bolle
Date: Wed May 13 2015 - 05:58:34 EST


On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 13:07 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:45:21PM +0200, anees wrote:
> > Kernel build fails with error "target elf32-or32 not found"
> > This is due to the change in OpenRISC compiler prefix from "or12"
> > to "or1k". Add config options that set architecture output format
> > default to "or1k" but also allow user to select older prefix.
> >
> > Tested with gcc version 4.9.1 uclibc
> >
> > Signed-off-by: anees <rean12is@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/openrisc/Kconfig | 12 ++++++++++++
> > arch/openrisc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 6 +++---
> > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/openrisc/Kconfig b/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
> > index e5a693b..c7fe7c8 100644
> > --- a/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
> > @@ -75,6 +75,18 @@ config OPENRISC_BUILTIN_DTB
> > string "Builtin DTB"
> > default ""
> >
> > +config OUTPUT_FORMAT_TYPE
> > + string "Architecture output format type"
> > + default "or1k"
> > + help
> > + Write "or12" if building kernel against an older toolchain
> > + else leave the default (or1k)
> > +
> That means I'll have to use different toolchains for different kernel
> versions, or hand-edit default configuration files to able to work
> with the same toolchain. Both is, from a testing perspective,
> quite annoying.

Also quite annoying would be
$ grep OUTPUT_FORMAT .config
CONFIG_OUTPUT_FORMAT_TYPE="typo"

(Note the missing CONFIG_OUTPUT_FORMAT= line.)

What might be less annoying would be something (completely untested)
like:
choice
prompt "Architecture output format type"
default OUTPUT_FORMAT_OR1K
help
Choose "or12" if building kernel against an older toolchain
else leave the default "or1k".

config OUTPUT_FORMAT_OR1K
bool "or1k"

config OUTPUT_FORMAT_OR12
bool "or12"

enchoice

config OUTPUT_FORMAT
string
default "elf32-or1k" if OUTPUT_FORMAT_OR1K
default "elf32-or12" if OUTPUT_FORMAT_OR12

> Maybe I should simply stop testing older kernels for openrisc
> after this patch has been merged; that would be much easier.
> Jonas, is that ok with you ?

Would testing be easier if you'd be provided with two defconfig files?
Ie, one for "elf32-or1k" and "elf32-or12".

(Note that "elf32-or12" smells like a typo to me. Shouldn't that be
"elf32-or32"? If not, where does "elf32-or32" fir in this story?)

> Side note: I didn't drop it from Cc:, but the openrisc.net domain
> name expired and appears to be for sale.

That's ominous.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/