[PATCH 3/4] x86, irq: Cleanup ordering of vector numbers

From: Aravind Gopalakrishnan
Date: Thu Apr 30 2015 - 15:52:39 EST


Enforcing proper descending order of vector number assignments here.
No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
index cee723f..244d486 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
@@ -102,11 +102,6 @@
*/
#define X86_PLATFORM_IPI_VECTOR 0xf7

-/* Vector for KVM to deliver posted interrupt IPI */
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM
-#define POSTED_INTR_VECTOR 0xf2
-#endif
-
/*
* IRQ work vector:
*/
@@ -118,6 +113,11 @@
/* Vector on which hypervisor callbacks will be delivered */
#define HYPERVISOR_CALLBACK_VECTOR 0xf3

+/* Vector for KVM to deliver posted interrupt IPI */
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM
+#define POSTED_INTR_VECTOR 0xf2
+#endif
+
/*
* Local APIC timer IRQ vector is on a different priority level,
* to work around the 'lost local interrupt if more than 2 IRQ
--
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/