Re: [PATCH] libata: Ignore spurious PHY events on LPM policy change

[Gabriele Mazzotta]

On Saturday 25 April 2015 11:37:51 Tejun Heo wrote:
> I thought more about it and it's weird to have ATA_LFLAG_CHANGED and
> last_lpm_change timestamp in libata core side and then open-code the
> actual logic in ahci.  How about implementing a generic helper, say,
> bool sata_lpm_ignore_phy_events(link) in libata core and use it in
> specific drivers?  It can test both the current lpm_policy and the
> timeout (preferably a separate patch to introduce the function and
> factor out lpm policy testing).

I agree. I'm now going to send the revised patches, thanks for all
the suggestions.

Gabriele

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/