[RFC PATCH 1/3] net/dsa: Refactor dsa_probe()

From: Jan Kaisrlik
Date: Tue Apr 21 2015 - 07:33:26 EST


From: Jan Kaisrlik <ja.kaisrlik@xxxxxxxxx>

This patch refactors dsa_probe in order to simplify code in the patch 2/3.

---
net/dsa/dsa.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
index 3731714..e2c0703 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
@@ -699,12 +699,56 @@ static inline void dsa_of_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
#endif

-static int dsa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int dsa_probe_common(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, struct device *parent)
{
+ struct dsa_platform_data *pd = dst->pd;
+ struct net_device *dev = dst->master_netdev;
+ int i;
+
+ dst->cpu_switch = -1;
+ dst->cpu_port = -1;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_chips; i++) {
+ struct dsa_switch *ds;
+
+ ds = dsa_switch_setup(dst, i, parent, pd->chip[i].host_dev);
+ if (IS_ERR(ds)) {
+ netdev_err(dev, "[%d]: couldn't create dsa switch instance (error %ld)\n",
+ i, PTR_ERR(ds));
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ dst->ds[i] = ds;
+ if (ds->drv->poll_link != NULL)
+ dst->link_poll_needed = 1;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If we use a tagging format that doesn't have an ethertype
+ * field, make sure that all packets from this point on get
+ * sent to the tag format's receive function.
+ */
+ wmb();
+ dev->dsa_ptr = (void *)dst;
+
+ if (dst->link_poll_needed) {
+ INIT_WORK(&dst->link_poll_work, dsa_link_poll_work);
+ init_timer(&dst->link_poll_timer);
+ dst->link_poll_timer.data = (unsigned long)dst;
+ dst->link_poll_timer.function = dsa_link_poll_timer;
+ dst->link_poll_timer.expires = round_jiffies(jiffies + HZ);
+ add_timer(&dst->link_poll_timer);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+}
+
+static int dsa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev){
struct dsa_platform_data *pd = pdev->dev.platform_data;
struct net_device *dev;
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst;
- int i, ret;
+ int ret;

pr_notice_once("Distributed Switch Architecture driver version %s\n",
dsa_driver_version);
@@ -743,40 +787,8 @@ static int dsa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

dst->pd = pd;
dst->master_netdev = dev;
- dst->cpu_switch = -1;
- dst->cpu_port = -1;
-
- for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_chips; i++) {
- struct dsa_switch *ds;
-
- ds = dsa_switch_setup(dst, i, &pdev->dev, pd->chip[i].host_dev);
- if (IS_ERR(ds)) {
- netdev_err(dev, "[%d]: couldn't create dsa switch instance (error %ld)\n",
- i, PTR_ERR(ds));
- continue;
- }
-
- dst->ds[i] = ds;
- if (ds->drv->poll_link != NULL)
- dst->link_poll_needed = 1;
- }
-
- /*
- * If we use a tagging format that doesn't have an ethertype
- * field, make sure that all packets from this point on get
- * sent to the tag format's receive function.
- */
- wmb();
- dev->dsa_ptr = (void *)dst;

- if (dst->link_poll_needed) {
- INIT_WORK(&dst->link_poll_work, dsa_link_poll_work);
- init_timer(&dst->link_poll_timer);
- dst->link_poll_timer.data = (unsigned long)dst;
- dst->link_poll_timer.function = dsa_link_poll_timer;
- dst->link_poll_timer.expires = round_jiffies(jiffies + HZ);
- add_timer(&dst->link_poll_timer);
- }
+ dsa_probe_common(dst, &pdev->dev);

return 0;

--
2.1.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/