Re: [PATCH v13 2/3] power-domain: rockchip: add power domain driver

From: Paul Bolle
Date: Mon Apr 20 2015 - 05:27:02 EST


On Sun, 2015-04-19 at 18:44 +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Makefile

+obj-$(CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS) += pm_domains.o

PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS is a bool symbol, so pm_domains.o can never be part
of a module. Is that correct?

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm_domains.c

> +#include <linux/module.h>

This include could probably be dropped.

> +static const struct of_device_id rockchip_pm_domain_dt_match[] = {
> + {
> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-controller",
> + .data = (void *)&rk3288_pmu,
> + },
> + { /* sentinel */ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rockchip_pm_domain_dt_match);

The MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() macro will be preprocessed away for built-in
code, according to include/linux/module.h.

> +static struct platform_driver rockchip_pm_domain_driver = {
> + .probe = rockchip_pm_domain_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "rockchip-pm-domain",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,

According to include/linux/export.h THIS_MODULE is equivalent to NULL
for built-in code. So I think this line is not needed.

> + .of_match_table = rockchip_pm_domain_dt_match,
> + /*
> + * We can't forcibly eject devices form power domain,
> + * so we can't really remove power domains once they
> + * were added.
> + */
> + .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
> + },
> +};

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/